Re: [BUG] regression from 974c5e6139db "xfs: flag as supporting FOP_DONTCACHE" (double free on page?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 14:49, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Perhaps
>
> -#define FOP_DONTCACHE           ((__force fop_flags_t)(1 << 7)) when shit gets fixed
> +#define FOP_DONTCACHE           0 // ((__force fop_flags_t)(1 << 7)) when shit gets fixed
>
> instead?

Yeah, I think that ends up being prettier than an extra error return
in the middle of code.

Will do. Thanks for noticing this, even if the timing is awkward.

              Linus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux