Hi, just one nitpick: On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 12:14:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > We already carry > quite a few filesystem drivers used by very few people and since few people > are interested it them it's difficult to find people to get these drivers > converted to new mount API, iomap infrastructure, new page cache APIs etc. > which forces us to keep carring the old interfaces. This gets particularly > painful for filesystems where we don't have full specification so usually > the mkfs and fsck tooling is not as comprehensive which makes testing > changes harder. For the record, my fsck [1] is far more thorough than the official one, I don't take data corruption lightly. It's only for testing though, it doesn't actually fix anything. And of course it could have mistakes since the specification is incomplete and buggy. [1] https://github.com/linux-apfs/apfsprogs
