On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 07:54:55AM +0800, Zizhi Wo wrote: > > > 在 2025/5/16 18:31, Jan Kara 写道: > > On Fri 16-05-25 11:21:47, Zizhi Wo wrote: > > > From: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Rename the parameter in mnt_get_write_access() from "m" to "mnt" for > > > consistency between declaration and implementation. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I'm sorry but this is just a pointless churn. I agree the declaration and > > implementation should better be consistent (although in this particular > > case it isn't too worrying) but it's much easier (and with much lower > > chance to cause conflicts) to just fixup the declaration. > > > > Honza > > Yes, I had considered simply fixing the declaration earlier. However, in > the include/linux/mount.h file, similar functions like > "mnt_put_write_access" use "mnt" as the parameter name rather than "m", > just like "mnt_get_write_access". So I chose to modify the function > implementation directly, although this resulted in a larger amount of > changes. So as you can see, for simplicity, I will directly update the > parameter name in the function declaration in the second version. FWIW, "mnt for vfsmount, m for mount" is an informal convention in that area, so I'd say go for it if there had been any change in the function in question. Same as with coding style, really...
