Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Remove redundant errseq_set call in mark_buffer_write_io_error.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jeremy Bongio <jbongio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Remove redundant errseq_set call in mark_buffer_write_io_error.
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:09:20 +0200
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAOvQCn5UySp1U2SmfDG59GZAavfOa4dbRwSWzfT3tumQ8OCBQg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 11:36:35AM -0700, Jeremy Bongio wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> Friendly ping. Can you take this bug fix?

Hey! This is already upstream. Thanks!

References:
- [PATCH v2] fs: Remove redundant errseq_set call in mark_buffer_write_io_error.
  - From: Jeremy Bongio
- Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Remove redundant errseq_set call in mark_buffer_write_io_error.
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Remove redundant errseq_set call in mark_buffer_write_io_error.
  - From: Jeremy Bongio

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] fs: introduce file_getattr and file_setattr syscalls
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fuse: dev: avoid a build warning when PROC_FS is not set
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Remove redundant errseq_set call in mark_buffer_write_io_error.
Next by thread: [syzbot] [fs?] [mm?] KCSAN: data-race in copy_fs / free_bprm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux