On Thu, 8 May 2025 13:52:01 +0530 Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [1]. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20250507133458.51bafd95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Sorry, pressed the send button too quickly :D > > I instead meant - "I plan to rebase my v4 on top of Steven's RFC, which > might mean that this patch would no longer need to address the trace > events, but would still need to handle other places where tsk->comm > directly in memcpy() and replace it with 'get_task_comm()' instead". Note I didn't switch all the events, just most of the sched events. This may affect user space that parses the raw events and may expect a hard coded string instead of a dynamic one (as the sched_switch and sched_waking events do). We will need to investigate before we make these changes, which is why I posted it as a RFC. -- Steve
