On Wed, 7 May 2025 14:54:36 +0200
Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > To fix the same, Linus suggested in [1] that we can add the
> > following union inside 'task_struct':
> > union {
> > char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN];
> > char real_comm[REAL_TASK_COMM_LEN];
> > };
>
> Nit: IMHO, the prefix "real_" is misleading. The buffer size is still
> limited and the name might be shrinked. I would suggest
Agreed.
> something like:
>
> char comm_ext[TASK_COMM_EXT_LEN];
> or
> char comm_64[TASK_COMM_64_LEN]
I prefer "comm_ext" as I don't think we want to hard code the actual size.
Who knows, in the future we may extend it again!
-- Steve
