On 2025-05-06 17:43:10 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 03:36:03PM +0200, Klara Modin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2025-05-05 04:03:45 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > it's simpler to do btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount() right after vfs_get_tree() - > > > no need to mess with ->s_umount. > > > > > > Objections? > > > > > > > I hit an oops on today's next-20250506 which seems to point here, and > > reverting makes it go away. > > > > Let me know if there's anything else you need. > > .config and toolchain information would be useful... The .config should already be attached (config.gz), though it's possible there's an issue with my email setup. It seems to be on lore at least. I'm using gcc 15.1 and binutils 2.44.
