Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction for passthrough fds (fuse)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bernd Schubert <bernd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction for passthrough fds (fuse)
From: Chen Linxuan <chenlinxuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 10:47:59 +0800
Cc: Allison Karlitskaya <lis@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>, Chen Linxuan <chenlinxuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Feedback-id: zesmtpsz:uniontech.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-1
In-reply-to: <ec87f7f4-5c12-4e71-952c-861f67dc4603@bsbernd.com>

On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 9:22 PM Bernd Schubert <bernd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think it would be good to document all these details somewhere,
> really hard to follow all of it.

I agree with you but where should we document these details?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction for passthrough fds (fuse)
  - From: Amir Goldstein

References:
- CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction for passthrough fds
  - From: Allison Karlitskaya
- Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction for passthrough fds (fuse)
  - From: Bernd Schubert

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] f2fs: new mount API conversion
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/11] fs: statx add write zeroes unmap attribute
Previous by thread: Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction for passthrough fds (fuse)
Next by thread: Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction for passthrough fds (fuse)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux