Re: kernel BUG in zero_user_segments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 25-04-25 15:29:41, Liebes Wang wrote:
> Dear Linux maintainers and reviewers:
> We are reporting a Linux kernel bug titled **kernel BUG in
> zero_user_segments**, discovered using a modified version of Syzkaller.
> 
> This bug seems to be duplicated as
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=78eeb671facb19832e95, but the test
> case is much smaller, which may be helpful for analyzing the bug.
> 
> Linux version: 9d7a0577c9db35c4cc52db90bc415ea248446472
> 
> The bisection log shows the first introduced commit is
> 982bf37da09d078570650b691d9084f43805a5de
> commit 982bf37da09d078570650b691d9084f43805a5de
> Author: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri Dec 20 09:16:31 2024 +0800
> 
>     ext4: refactor ext4_punch_hole()
> 
>     The current implementation of ext4_punch_hole() contains complex
>     position calculations and stale error tags. To improve the code's
>     clarity and maintainability, it is essential to clean up the code and
>     improve its readability, this can be achieved by: a) simplifying and
>     renaming variables; b) eliminating unnecessary position calculations;
>     c) writing back all data in data=journal mode, and drop page cache from
>     the original offset to the end, rather than using aligned blocks,
>     d) renaming the stale error tags.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
>     Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Link:
> https://patch.msgid.link/20241220011637.1157197-5-yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>

So there's something suspicious about this report. The stacktrace shows
we've crashed in punch hole code (call from ioctl_preallocate()) but the
reproducer actually never calls this. Anyway, the reported stack trace ends
with truncate_inode_partial_folio() -> folio_zero_range() ->
zero_user_segments(). The assertion that's failing is:

BUG_ON(end1 > page_size(page) || end2 > page_size(page));

Now it seems that this assertion can indeed easily trigger when we have
a large folio because truncate_inode_partial_folio() is called to zero out
tail of the whole folio which can certainly be more than a page. Matthew,
am I missing something (I guess I am because otherwise I'd expect we'd be
crashing left and right) or is the folio conversion on this path indeed
broken?

								Honza

> 
> The test case, kernel config and full bisection log are attached.
> 
> The report is (The full report is attached):
> EXT4-fs (loop7): mounted filesystem 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
> r/w without journal. Quota mode: writeback.
> EXT4-fs warning (device loop7): ext4_block_to_path:105: block 2147483648 >
> max in inode 15
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at ./include/linux/highmem.h:275!
> Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6795 Comm: syz.7.479 Not tainted
> 6.15.0-rc3-g9d7a0577c9db #1 PREEMPT(voluntary)
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:zero_user_segments.constprop.0+0x10c/0x290
> include/linux/highmem.h:275
> Code: 0f b6 4b 40 ba 00 10 00 00 48 d3 e2 49 89 d7 e8 ba d5 e2 ff 4c 89 fe
> 4c 89 ef e8 3f d0 e2 ff 4d 39 fd 76 08 e8 a5 d5 e2 ff 90 <0f> 0b e8 9d d5
> e2 ff be 08 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 a0 9c 1d 00 48 89
> RSP: 0018:ffff8881235ff678 EFLAGS: 00010216
> RAX: 000000000000025d RBX: ffffea00056071c0 RCX: ffffc90002e0b000
> RDX: 0000000000080000 RSI: ffffffff818f7b0b RDI: 0000000000000006
> RBP: 000000000040b000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffff94000ac0e38
> R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000005
> R13: 000000000040b000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000001000
> FS:  00007fecef19d700(0000) GS:ffff888543948000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f5e38b40008 CR3: 000000013ebaa001 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
> PKRU: 80000000
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  folio_zero_range include/linux/highmem.h:647 [inline]
>  truncate_inode_partial_folio+0x6da/0xbd0 mm/truncate.c:219
>  truncate_inode_pages_range+0x3fc/0xcc0 mm/truncate.c:387
>  ext4_truncate_page_cache_block_range+0xb3/0x5c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:3974
>  ext4_punch_hole+0x2cd/0xec0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4049
>  ext4_fallocate+0x128d/0x32c0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4766
>  vfs_fallocate+0x3ed/0xd70 fs/open.c:338
>  ioctl_preallocate+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:290
>  file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:333 [inline]
>  do_vfs_ioctl+0x149c/0x1850 fs/ioctl.c:885
>  __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
>  __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11f/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x1d0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

> syz_mount_image$ext4(&(0x7f0000000400)='ext4\x00', &(0x7f00000001c0)='./file0\x00', 0x0, &(0x7f0000000280)={[{@journal_ioprio}, {@mb_optimize_scan}, {@data_err_ignore}, {@grpquota}, {@barrier}]}, 0x1, 0x3cb, &(0x7f00000026c0)="$eJzs3M9rHFUcAPDvTH61aXUjeBC9LAgaELPZpFoFRQUFD55sLx48LLtpLW4aabZgSw4VPHnVf0AE79V/QBDFmzdvgmBFKRRJe/K0Mrsz6ZrsxsTduEn6+cBj35uZzXvfndnhO5OdF8ADqxwRr0bEREQsRUQpX57mJW50S7bdvc2NelaSaLfP/ZlEEhF3Nzfqxd9K8tdTeWM+jUg/jnjixs5+169df7/WbK5cyduV1uoHlfVr15+9tFq7uHJx5XL1hRefX1o+Wz1zdmSx3vz53PKv377+w1e/PfXTj+2Xv8jGezpf1xvHqJSjvPWZbPfcqDsbs+lxDwAAgD1J89x/spP/l2KiU+sqRWVjrIMDAAAARqL9Sv4KAAAAHGOJa38AAAA45orfAdzd3KgXZYw/R/jf3XktIua68RfPN3fXTMaJfJupA3y+tRwRJ95uvJOVOKDnkAEAen2T5T+L/fK/NB7r2W4my1Mi4uSI+y9va+/Mf9LbI+7yH7L876WeuW3u9cSfm5vIWw91UsWp5MKl5spiRDwcEfMxNZO1q7v0cWvmk5lB63rzv6xk/Re5YD6O25Pb3t2otWrDxNzrzkcRj0/2iz/Zyn+TiJgdoo8v/7p5ddC6f4//YLU/j3i67/6/P3NPsvv8RJXO8VApjoqdbq3+8u6g/scdf7b/Z3ePfy7pna9pff99/L54frVT6XPy+K/H/3RyvlMvrss+rLVaV6oR08lbO5cv3X9v0S62z+Kff7L/9784/yX5nFan83PAfn339XufDlp3GPZ/Y1/7f/+VN978fojvf7b/z3Rq8/mSvZz/9jrAYT47AAAAOCrSzn2NJF3YqqfpwkL3fsejMZs219Zbz1xYu3q50b3/MRdTaXGnq9RzP7Ta/Tf6VntpW3s5Ih6JiM9KJzvthfpaszHu4AEAAOABcWrA9X/mj9K4RwcAAACMzNy4BwAAAAAcONf/AAAAcKwNM6+fymGv1ONQDEPlCFbGfWYCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA42v4OAAD///tZxK0=")
> quotactl_fd$Q_SETINFO(0xffffffffffffffff, 0x2, 0x0, &(0x7f0000000080)={0x80000000000002, 0x80000000005, 0x1, 0x6})
> r0 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file1\x00', 0x42, 0x1ff)
> ioctl$EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT(r0, 0x40305829, &(0x7f0000000080)=0x5)
> r1 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file1\x00', 0x42, 0x1ff)
> ioctl$EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT(r1, 0x40305829, &(0x7f0000000080)=0x5)





-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux