On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 07:54:51AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 06:59:41AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The recent move of the bdev_statx call to the low-level vfs_getattr_nosec > > helper caused it being used by devtmpfs, which leads to deadlocks in > > md teardown due to the block device lookup and put interfering with the > > unusual lifetime rules in md. > > > > But as handle_remove only works on inodes created and owned by devtmpfs > > itself there is no need to use vfs_getattr_nosec vs simply reading the > > mode from the inode directly. Switch to that to avoid the bdev lookup > > or any other unintentional side effect. > > > > Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Fixes: 777d0961ff95 ("fs: move the bdex_statx call to vfs_getattr_nosec") > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> Do you want me to take this through the driver-core tree, or is this a fs-specific thing as that's where the regression showed up from? Either is fine with me. thanks, greg k-h