[no subject]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



They can be easily fixed with fsck_hfs from hfsprogs though.

> (3) Let me prepare environment and start to run xfstests for HFS/HFS+ (to check
> the current status).

I suggest a Debian VM for that as it has hfsprogs which allows creating both
HFS and HFS+ filesystems. It's also easily possible to test on PowerPC inside
QEMU if necessary.

> (4) Which use-cases do we need to consider for regular testing?

Definitely testing both legacy HFS and HFS+ with creating new filesystems, writing
and reading random files from it as well as running fsck on these.

I'm not a Linux kernel filesystem expert, so I don't know what the recommend tests
for CI are, but I suggest everything that is commonly used, both with HFS and HFS+.

> Anything else? What am I missing?

No, I think that should get us going for the time being.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux