Re: {FD,O,...}_CLOFORK have been added by POSIX.1-2024

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mateusz,

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:44:38PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:21:26PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Hi Jeff, Chuck,
> > 
> > I'm updating the Linux man-pages for POSIX.1-2024, and I noticed that
> > POSIX.1-2024 has added *_CLOFORK flags (with the obvious behavior).
> > This is just to let you know about it, and also ask if there's any work
> > in adding these flags.  I'll note something about the existence of
> > these flags, and that they're unsupported by Linux, at least for now.
> > Is that okay?
> > 
> 
> There was an attempt to add them and the idea itself got NAKed, for
> example:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200515160342.GE23230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Makes sense.  Thanks for the link!  I'll document that POSIX.1-2024 is
purposefully ignored here.


Have a lovely night!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux