On 4/21/25 2:51 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:26:54PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 4/21/25 2:24 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 4/21/25 11:18 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Here are a handful of bugfixes for 6.15. The first patch fixes a race >>>> between set_blocksize and block device pagecache manipulation; the rest >>>> removes XFS' usage of set_blocksize since it's unnecessary. >>>> >>>> If you're going to start using this code, I strongly recommend pulling >>>> from my git trees, which are linked below. >>>> >>>> With a bit of luck, this should all go splendidly. >>>> Comments and questions are, as always, welcome. >>> >>> block changes look good to me - I'll tentatively queue those up. >> >> Hmm looks like it's built on top of other changes in your branch, >> doesn't apply cleanly. > > Yeah, I'm still waiting for hch (or anyone) to RVB patches 2 and 3. Maybe I wasn't 100% clear, but what I mean is that patches 1 and 2 don't apply to the upstream kernel, as they are sitting on top of other patches that block block/bdev.c in your tree. So even if acked, they can't go in as-is. Well they can, I'd just have to hand apply them. Which isn't the end of the world, but the dependency wasn't clear (to me, at least) in the sent out patches. -- Jens Axboe
