On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 11:59:13AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Not sure we have a list for library code, but this might be of interest > to anyone who's had to debug refcount issues on refs with lots of users > (filesystem people), and I know the hardening folks deal with refcounts > a lot. Why not use refcount_t instead of atomic_t? -- Kees Cook
