Greetings:
Sending as an RFC against vfs/for-next because I am not sure which
branch to send this against.
It's possible this should be against vfs.fixes with a Fixes
bf3b9f6372c4 ("epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with socket
fds."), but I am not sure.
The commit message explains the issue in detail, please see the commit
message for details.
If this patch is appropriate, please let me know:
- which branch to generate the patch against (I suspect vfs/for-next
is wrong),
- whether to include the fixes tag mentioned above or if this is
considered "new code" instead of a bug fix and I'll omit the fixes.
I'll re-send as instructed (without this cover letter)... or not if this
patch is incorrect/not desirable :)
Thanks,
Joe
Joe Damato (1):
eventpoll: Set epoll timeout if it's in the future
fs/eventpoll.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
base-commit: 2e72b1e0aac24a12f3bf3eec620efaca7ab7d4de
--
2.43.0
