Re: bad things when too many negative dentries in a directory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 16:47, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Note that we have a new sysctl:
>
> /proc/sys/fs/dentry-negative
>
> that can be used to control the negative dentry policy because any
> generic change that we tried to make has always resulted in unacceptable
> regressions for someone's workload. Currently we only allow it to be set
> to 1 (default 0). If set to 1 it will not create negative dentries
> during unlink. If that's sufficient than recommend this to users that
> suffer from this problem if not consider adding another sensitive
> policy.

Okay, I'll forward that info.

However, hundreds of millions of negative dentries can be created
rather efficiently without unlink, though this one probably doesn't
happen under normal circumstances.  Allowing this to starve the
scheduler for an arbitrary long time is not a good idea in any case,
so the fsnotify problem needs some other solution, and I suspect that
it's not to disable negative caching completely, as that would be a
major bummer.

But the idea of leaving negative dentries off d_children is
independent of caching policy.  The lookup cache would work fine
without d_sib being chained, it only needs careful thought in

1) putting the dentry on d_children when it's turned into positive
2) getting the dentry off d_children when it's turned into negative.

Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux