Re: [PATCH 1/5] fs/filesystems: Fix potential unsigned integer underflow in fs_name()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025/4/11 22:35, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> Fix by breaking the for loop when '@index == 0' which is also more proper
>> than '@index <= 0' for unsigned integer comparison.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> This is honestly not worth the effort thinking about.
> I'm going to propose that we remove this system call or at least switch
> the default to N. Nobody uses this anymore I'm pretty sure

Sound good.

i just started looking at FS code (^^).





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux