On 04.04.25 22:09, Joanne Koong wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 12:13 PM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 04.04.25 20:14, Joanne Koong wrote:
Add a new mapping flag AS_WRITEBACK_INDETERMINATE which filesystems may
set to indicate that writing back to disk may take an indeterminate
amount of time to complete. Extra caution should be taken when waiting
on writeback for folios belonging to mappings where this flag is set.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/pagemap.h | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 26baa78f1ca7..762575f1d195 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ enum mapping_flags {
AS_STABLE_WRITES = 7, /* must wait for writeback before modifying
folio contents */
AS_INACCESSIBLE = 8, /* Do not attempt direct R/W access to the mapping */
+ AS_WRITEBACK_INDETERMINATE = 9, /* Use caution when waiting on writeback */
/* Bits 16-25 are used for FOLIO_ORDER */
AS_FOLIO_ORDER_BITS = 5,
AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN = 16,
@@ -335,6 +336,16 @@ static inline bool mapping_inaccessible(struct address_space *mapping)
return test_bit(AS_INACCESSIBLE, &mapping->flags);
}
+static inline void mapping_set_writeback_indeterminate(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ set_bit(AS_WRITEBACK_INDETERMINATE, &mapping->flags);
+}
+
+static inline bool mapping_writeback_indeterminate(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ return test_bit(AS_WRITEBACK_INDETERMINATE, &mapping->flags);
+}
+
static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_mask(struct address_space * mapping)
{
return mapping->gfp_mask;
Staring at this again reminds me of my comment in [1]
"
b) Call it sth. like AS_WRITEBACK_MIGHT_DEADLOCK_ON_RECLAIM to express
that very deadlock problem.
"
In the context here now, where we really only focus on the reclaim
deadlock that can happen for trusted FUSE servers during reclaim, would
it make sense to call it now something like that?
Happy to make this change. My thinking was that
'AS_WRITEBACK_INDETERMINATE' could be reused in the future for stuff
besides reclaim, but we can cross that bridge if that ends up being
the case.
Yes, but I'm afraid one we start using it in other context we're
reaching the point where we are trying to deal with untrusted user space
and the page lock would already be a similar problem.
Happy to be wrong on this one.
Wait for other opinions first. Apart from that, no objection from my side.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
