On Wed 02-04-25 16:07:32, Christian Brauner wrote:
> During freeze/thaw we need to be able to freeze all writers during
> suspend/hibernate. Otherwise tasks such as systemd-journald that mmap a
> file and write to it will not be frozen after we've already frozen the
> filesystem.
>
> This has some risk of not being able to freeze processes in case a
> process has acquired SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT under mmap_sem or
> SB_FREEZE_INTERNAL under some other filesytem specific lock. If the
> filesystem is frozen, a task can block on the frozen filesystem with
> e.g., mmap_sem held. If some other task then blocks on grabbing that
> mmap_sem, hibernation ill fail because it is unable to hibernate a task
> holding mmap_sem. This could be fixed by making a range of filesystem
> related locks use freezable sleeping. That's impractical and not
> warranted just for suspend/hibernate. Assume that this is an infrequent
> problem and we've given userspace a way to skip filesystem freezing
> through a sysfs file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
BTW, I agree about the need to silence lockdep somehow.
Honza
> ---
> include/linux/fs.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index b379a46b5576..1edcba3cd68e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1781,8 +1781,7 @@ static inline void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
>
> static inline void __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
> {
> - percpu_down_read_freezable(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level - 1,
> - level == SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
> + percpu_down_read_freezable(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level - 1, true);
> }
>
> static inline bool __sb_start_write_trylock(struct super_block *sb, int level)
>
> --
> 2.47.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
