On 4/2/25 20:33, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 19:41, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> This is especially needed for better ftrace analysis, >> for example to build histograms. So far the request unique >> was missing, because it was added after the first trace message. >> >> IDs/req-unique now might not come up perfectly sequentially >> anymore, but especially with cloned device or io-uring this >> did not work perfectly anyway. > > Well, we can try in any case. It would be a pretty insane server that > actually looks at the h->unique value, but not impossible. Should be easy to revert if someone complains. We could have another (and for sure per-cpu counter) and add that into ftrace output. Thanks, Bernd
