David, I know that I will regret my email tomorrow, but On 03/28, David Howells wrote: > > #syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git netfs-fixes > > There's inconsistency with some wakeups between using rreq->waitq (a private > waitqueue) and using clear_and_wake_up_bit() (a shared global waitqueue). Too late for me, I didn't even try to read the "netfs-fixes" changes. And if I even tried, I probably wouldn't understand them ;) But, afaics (I can be easily wrong), the curent logic in net/9p/ doesn't look right regardless of any other fixes, no? Oleg.