[LSF/MM/BPF Topic] Filesystem reclaim & memory allocation BOF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We've got three reports now (two are syzkaller kiddie stuff, but one's a
real workload) of a warning in the page allocator from filesystems
doing reclaim.  Essentially they're using GFP_NOFAIL from reclaim
context.  This got me thinking about bs>PS and I realised that if we fix
this, then we're going to end up trying to do high order GFP_NOFAIL allocations
in the memory reclaim path, and that is really no bueno.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250326105914.3803197-1-matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

I'll prepare a better explainer of the problem in advance of this.  It
looks like we have a slot at 17:30 today?

Required attendees: Ted, Luis, Chris, Josef, other people who've wrestled
with this before.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux