On 03/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > I won't argue with another solution. But this problem is quite old, Yes, but... > unless I am totally confused this logic was wrong from the very > beginning when fs->in_exec was introduced by 498052bba55ec. OK, I was wrong. According to git show 498052bba55ec:fs/exec.c this patch was correct in this respect. Sorry for the noise. > So to me it would be better to have the trivial fix for stable, > exactly because it is trivially backportable. Then cleanup/simplify > this logic on top of it. Yes... Oleg.
