Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:44:27 +0000
Cc: brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, djwong@xxxxxxxxxx, cem@xxxxxxxxxx, dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250318054810.GA14955@lst.de>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 18/03/2025 05:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

As said before what I'd really like to see going along with this is
a good set of test for xfstests, including exercising the worst case
of the atomic always COW writes.

ok, fine. We already had something for the forcealign stuff, so canrework that.


Thanks

References:
- [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
  - From: John Garry
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4] fs/proc/page: Refactoring to reduce code duplication.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
Next by thread: [PATCH] VFS/autofs: try_lookup_one_len() does not need any locks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux