On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 07:25:30PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 27-03-25 23:18:09, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote: > > Block validity checks need to be skipped in case they are called > > for journal blocks since they are part of system's protected > > zone. > > > > Currently, this is done by checking inode->ino against > > sbi->s_es->s_journal_inum, which is a direct read from the ext4 sb > > buffer head. If someone modifies this underneath us then the > > s_journal_inum field might get corrupted. To prevent against this, > > change the check to directly compare the inode with journal->j_inode. > > > > **Slight change in behavior**: During journal init path, > > check_block_validity etc might be called for journal inode when > > sbi->s_journal is not set yet. In this case we now proceed with > > ext4_inode_block_valid() instead of returning early. Since systems zones > > have not been set yet, it is okay to proceed so we can perform basic > > checks on the blocks. > > > > Suggested-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks good. Feel free to add: > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > One style nit below: > > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c > > index 87ee3a17bd29..e8c5525afc67 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c > > +++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c > > @@ -351,10 +351,9 @@ int ext4_check_blockref(const char *function, unsigned int line, > > { > > __le32 *bref = p; > > unsigned int blk; > > + journal_t *journal = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal; > > > > - if (ext4_has_feature_journal(inode->i_sb) && > > - (inode->i_ino == > > - le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es->s_journal_inum))) > > + if (journal && inode == journal->j_inode) > > return 0; > > > > while (bref < p+max) { > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > > index 365d31004bd0..8b048be14008 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > > @@ -384,10 +384,11 @@ static int __check_block_validity(struct inode *inode, const char *func, > > unsigned int line, > > struct ext4_map_blocks *map) > > { > > - if (ext4_has_feature_journal(inode->i_sb) && > > - (inode->i_ino == > > - le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es->s_journal_inum))) > > - return 0; > > + journal_t *journal = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal; > > + > > + if (journal && inode == journal->j_inode) > > + return 0; > > Bogus indentation here. Thanks for the review Jan and for catching this. My bad, i missed running checkpatch on this and somehow this looked okay in vim. I'll fix this and quickly send a v3. Regards, ojaswin > > Honza > -- > Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> > SUSE Labs, CR