On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:07:25 -0400 "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 04:56:35AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:49:35AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > > This really goes to my question of exactly how useful the file > > > creation time concept really is. Perhaps that's why the developers at > > > the UC Berkley made ctime be "inode change time", I suspect when they > > > authored the BSD Fast File System 42 years ago. Personally, while I > > > don't find "change time" to be all that useful --- I find "creation > > > time" an order of magnitude *more* useless. :-) > > > > The third timestamp had been introduced in v7 and it had been "change > > time" from the very beginning, with incremental backups as stated > > rationale in filesys(5). "I'm sure that" from David means "I couldn't > > be arsed to check my WAG"... > > > I actually pulled down the V7 sources and there was a comment in > /usr/sys/h/ino.h which has a comment around the on-disk inode stating > "creation time" (see below). These comments are also there up to > 3BSD, and changed to "inode change time" in the BSD 4.2 sources, > probably coincident with the BSD Fast File System implementation. > > So to be fair to David, I'm guessing this is what he saw. Quite likely - it was a long time ago and I didn't take an 'offsite backup' of the sources (and I definitely have nothing that will read the system disk from an old 68010 box). I didn't use Unix until the mid 80s - and I think that was SVR2 rather than anything Berkeley. Most of the systems were SVR4 - around the time of the initial collaboration between AT&T and Sun to get SMP working (which, IIRC, pulled some BSD code into SVR4). > I still maintain that "creation time" as a concept isn't terribly > useful, and that's probably *why* historical Unix systems have used > ctime as "change time" for decades. Whether it's 42 years or 45 years > doesn't really change my point. I do have half a brain cell that remembers it not quite being 'file create' time - probably just changes to di_mode, di_uid or di_gid. Anyway it is all old history. David > > - Ted > > struct dinode > { > unsigned short di_mode; /* mode and type of file */ > short di_nlink; /* number of links to file */ > short di_uid; /* owner's user id */ > short di_gid; /* owner's group id */ > off_t di_size; /* number of bytes in file */ > char di_addr[40]; /* disk block addresses */ > time_t di_atime; /* time last accessed */ > time_t di_mtime; /* time last modified */ > time_t di_ctime; /* time created */ > }; >