On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 02:14:10PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 12:31:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 08:06:01PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 18:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.16.2 release. > > > > There are 564 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:27:23 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.16.2-rc2.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.16.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > As I have reported last week on 6.16.1-rc1 as regression is > > > still noticed on 6.16.2-rc2. > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7012 at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:334 start_this_handle > > > > > > Full test log: > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > [ 153.965287] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7012 at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:334 > > > start_this_handle+0x4df/0x500 > > > > The problem is that we only applied the last two patches in: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20250707140814.542883-1-yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Naresh is on vacation until Monday, but he tested the patchset on > > linux-next and it fixed the issues. So we need to cherry-pick the > > following commits. > > > > 1bfe6354e097 ext4: process folios writeback in bytes > > f922c8c2461b ext4: move the calculation of wbc->nr_to_write to mpage_folio_done() > > ded2d726a304 ext4: fix stale data if it bail out of the extents mapping loop > > 2bddafea3d0d ext4: refactor the block allocation process of ext4_page_mkwrite() > > e2c4c49dee64 ext4: restart handle if credits are insufficient during allocating blocks > > 6b132759b0fe ext4: enhance tracepoints during the folios writeback > > 95ad8ee45cdb ext4: correct the reserved credits for extent conversion > > bbbf150f3f85 ext4: reserved credits for one extent during the folio writeback > > 57661f28756c ext4: replace ext4_writepage_trans_blocks() > > > > They all apply cleanly to 6.16.3-rc1. > > Ugh. Ok, let me go push out a -rc for JUST this issue now so that > people can test and I can get it released for those that are tripped up > by it. Thanks for the information, much appreciated. Now pushed out.
