https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220288 --- Comment #6 from Martin Vahi (martin.vahi@xxxxxxxxxx) --- Thank You for the answers. I guess the issue is then my expectation about how the fsck.ext4 is supposed to be used. At the moment it seems to me that the solution is that people with my use case should be using a use case specific wrapper of fsck.ext4, not the very capable tool, fsck.ext4, directly. Thank You for reading my comment. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
