On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 02:05:05PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 16/05/2025 13:19, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > + Carlos > > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:55:09AM +0100, John Garry wrote: > >> Or move this file to a common location, and have separate sections for ext4 > >> and xfs? This would save having scattered files for instructions. > > What is the current outook for the xfs changes landing in the next > > merge window? > > The changes have been queued, please see: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/174665351406.2683464.14829425904827876762.stg-ugh@frogsfrogsfrogs/ Hi Ted, XFS changes are here: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git/log/?h=xfs-6.16-merge > > > I haven't been tracking the latest rounds of reviews > > for the xfs atomic writes patchset. > > > > If the xfs atomic writes patchset aren't going to land this window, > > then we can land them as ext4 specific documentation, and when the xfs > > patches land, we can reorganize the documentation at that point. Does > > that make sense? > They have been also in xfs/for-next for a while now. This is likely the final state for XFS merge-window and I hope to send it to Linus as soon as the merge window opens. Hope this helps. > So I figure that we can organise the documentation now to cover both > ext4 and xfs. > > Thanks, > John
