On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 11:55:13AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 05/05/2025 11:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 11:04:55AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> > > @@ -503,6 +509,9 @@ xfs_open_devices(
> > > mp->m_logdev_targp = xfs_alloc_buftarg(mp, logdev_file);
> > > if (!mp->m_logdev_targp)
> > > goto out_free_rtdev_targ;
> > > + error = sync_blockdev(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> > > + if (error)
> > > + goto out_free_rtdev_targ;
> > > } else {
> > > mp->m_logdev_targp = mp->m_ddev_targp;
> > > /* Handle won't be used, drop it */
> > >
> > >
> > > Right?
> > Yes. Or in fact just folding it into xfs_alloc_buftarg, which might
> > be even simpler.
>
> Yes, that was my next question..
>
> > While you're at it adding a command why we are doing
> > the sync would also be really useful, and having it in just one place
> > helps with that.
>
> ok, there was such comment in xfs_preflush_devices().
>
> @Darrick, please comment on whether happy with changes discussed.
I put the sync_blockdev calls in a separate function so that the
EIO/ENOSPC/whatever errors that come from the block device sync don't
get morphed into ENOMEM by xfs_alloc_buftarg before being passed up. I
suppose we could make that function return an ERR_PTR, but I was trying
to avoid making even more changes at the last minute, again.
--D
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
