From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> Apparently fuse munged rename and renameat2 together into the same upcall, so we actually have to filter out nonzero flags because otherwise we do a regular rename for a RENAME_EXCHANGE/WHITEOUT, which is not what the user asked for. Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> --- misc/fuse2fs.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/misc/fuse2fs.c b/misc/fuse2fs.c index 7db0a2d1f2d855..420fbfd5db5969 100644 --- a/misc/fuse2fs.c +++ b/misc/fuse2fs.c @@ -1447,6 +1447,12 @@ static int op_rename(const char *from, const char *to struct update_dotdot ud; int ret = 0; +#if FUSE_VERSION >= FUSE_MAKE_VERSION(3, 0) + /* renameat2 is not supported */ + if (flags) + return -ENOSYS; +#endif + FUSE2FS_CHECK_CONTEXT(ff); fs = ff->fs; dbg_printf(ff, "%s: renaming %s to %s\n", __func__, from, to);
