On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 01:37:11PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:38:20AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > generic/04[456] fail with a bunch of... > > Yeah, this is known. I have an ext4-specific exclude file: > > // generic/04[456] tests how truncate and delayed allocation works > // ext4 uses the data=ordered to avoid exposing stale data, and > // so it uses a different mechanism than xfs. So these tests will fail > generic/044 > generic/045 > generic/046 Perhaps something like (not tested):
