On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 06:23:54PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
So I don't like removing that commit because it makes a
"reproducible with a heavy stress test" problem become a "reproduced by
real world workloads" problem.
So how about just patch 2 and 8 in this series, with the spin lock
removal happening on the last patch for Linus tree?
fyi I sent out a new series (trimmed some recipients), addressing the concerns
laid out in this approach.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250415231635.83960-1-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
Similar to adding artificial delays to a vanilla kernel, the only behavior
these modifications cause is a quicker triggering of the aforementioned
(yet independent) ext4 warning splat/corruption.
