On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 12:28:37PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > SIOCBRDELIF is passed to dev_ioctl() first and later forwarded to > br_ioctl_call(), which causes unnecessary RTNL dance and the splat > below [0] under RTNL pressure. > > Let's say Thread A is trying to detach a device from a bridge and > Thread B is trying to remove the bridge. > > In dev_ioctl(), Thread A bumps the bridge device's refcnt by > netdev_hold() and releases RTNL because the following br_ioctl_call() > also re-acquires RTNL. > > In the race window, Thread B could acquire RTNL and try to remove > the bridge device. Then, rtnl_unlock() by Thread B will release RTNL > and wait for netdev_put() by Thread A. > > Thread A, however, must hold RTNL after the unlock in dev_ifsioc(), > which may take long under RTNL pressure, resulting in the splat by > Thread B. > > Thread A (SIOCBRDELIF) Thread B (SIOCBRDELBR) > ---------------------- ---------------------- > sock_ioctl sock_ioctl > `- sock_do_ioctl `- br_ioctl_call > `- dev_ioctl `- br_ioctl_stub > |- rtnl_lock | > |- dev_ifsioc ' > ' |- dev = __dev_get_by_name(...) > |- netdev_hold(dev, ...) . > / |- rtnl_unlock ------. | > | |- br_ioctl_call `---> |- rtnl_lock > Race | | `- br_ioctl_stub |- br_del_bridge > Window | | | |- dev = __dev_get_by_name(...) > | | | May take long | `- br_dev_delete(dev, ...) > | | | under RTNL pressure | `- unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, ...) > | | | | `- rtnl_unlock > \ | |- rtnl_lock <-' `- netdev_run_todo > | |- ... `- netdev_run_todo > | `- rtnl_unlock |- __rtnl_unlock > | |- netdev_wait_allrefs_any > |- netdev_put(dev, ...) <----------------' > Wait refcnt decrement > and log splat below > > To avoid blocking SIOCBRDELBR unnecessarily, let's not call > dev_ioctl() for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF. > > In the dev_ioctl() path, we do the following: > > 1. Copy struct ifreq by get_user_ifreq in sock_do_ioctl() > 2. Check CAP_NET_ADMIN in dev_ioctl() > 3. Call dev_load() in dev_ioctl() > 4. Fetch the master dev from ifr.ifr_name in dev_ifsioc() > > 3. can be done by request_module() in br_ioctl_call(), so we move > 1., 2., and 4. to br_ioctl_stub(). > > Note that 2. is also checked later in add_del_if(), but it's better > performed before RTNL. > > SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF have been processed in dev_ioctl() since > the pre-git era, and there seems to be no specific reason to process > them there. > > [0]: > unregister_netdevice: waiting for wpan3 to become free. Usage count = 2 > ref_tracker: wpan3@ffff8880662d8608 has 1/1 users at > __netdev_tracker_alloc include/linux/netdevice.h:4282 [inline] > netdev_hold include/linux/netdevice.h:4311 [inline] > dev_ifsioc+0xc6a/0x1160 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:624 > dev_ioctl+0x255/0x10c0 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:826 > sock_do_ioctl+0x1ca/0x260 net/socket.c:1213 > sock_ioctl+0x23a/0x6c0 net/socket.c:1318 > vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] > __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] > __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline] > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a4/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:892 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0xcb/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > > Fixes: 893b19587534 ("net: bridge: fix ioctl locking") > Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: yan kang <kangyan91@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: yue sun <samsun1006219@xxxxxxxxx> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/SY8P300MB0421225D54EB92762AE8F0F2A1D32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx>