workaround for Sphinx false positive preventing indexing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: kevinpaul468@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: workaround for Sphinx false positive preventing indexing
From: Kevin Paul Reddy Janagari <kevinpaul468@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:04:27 +0530
Cc: airlied@xxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mripard@xxxxxxxxxx, simona@xxxxxxxx, tzimmermann@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250702161337.69943-1-kevinpaul468@gmail.com>
References: <20250702161337.69943-1-kevinpaul468@gmail.com>

THe V2 of the patch was tested by Bagas Sanjaya
and Reviewed by Mauro, In V3 I made the changes Mauro suggested
Wanted to know what is the status of the patch

References:
- [PATCH v3] workaround for Sphinx false positive preventing indexing
  - From: Kevin Paul Reddy Janagari

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Documentation/sphinx: Fix typo in automarkup.py
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: Add real-time
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3] workaround for Sphinx false positive preventing indexing
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next,v3 0/2] Clarify and Enhance XDP Rx Metadata Handling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux