Hi, On 8/17/25 5:22 AM, Bartlomiej Kubik wrote: > found/fix two warnings in kernel-parameters.rst. > > -> WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 > -> WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'that' > > command: > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst > > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Kubik <kubik.bartlomiej@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst > index 39d0e7ff0965..445248787e77 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > .. _kernelparameters: > > The kernel's command-line parameters > @@ -213,7 +215,7 @@ need or coordination with <Documentation/arch/x86/boot.rst>. > There are also arch-specific kernel-parameters not documented here. > > Note that ALL kernel parameters listed below are CASE SENSITIVE, and that > -a trailing = on the name of any parameter states that that parameter will While that may be a little confusing, and it reported as a "Possible repeated word," I can read it and not see any problem with it. A satisfactory change IMO would be to say "states that the parameter". > +a trailing = on the name of any parameter states that parameter will > be entered as an environment variable, whereas its absence indicates that > it will appear as a kernel argument readable via /proc/cmdline by programs > running once the system is up. -- ~Randy
