On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 10:43:02AM +0800, Yibo Dong wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 04:13:52AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > +const struct mucse_mbx_operations mucse_mbx_ops_generic = {
> > > + .init_params = mucse_init_mbx_params_pf,
> > > + .read = mucse_read_mbx_pf,
> > > + .write = mucse_write_mbx_pf,
> > > + .read_posted = mucse_read_posted_mbx,
> > > + .write_posted = mucse_write_posted_mbx,
> > > + .check_for_msg = mucse_check_for_msg_pf,
> > > + .check_for_ack = mucse_check_for_ack_pf,
> > > + .configure = mucse_mbx_configure_pf,
> > > +};
> >
> > As far as i can see, this is the only instance of
> > mucse_mbx_operations. Will there be other instances of this structure?
> >
> > Andrew
> >
>
> Yes, It is the only instance. Not other instances at all.
> Is there any improvement?
So throw away the abstraction and call the functions directly. Only
add abstractions if you have some differences to abstract over. Only
make the driver more complex and harder to understand, if you need to
make the driver more complex and harder to understand.... KISS.
Andrew
