Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: clarify the expected collaboration with security bugs reporters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 09:27:29PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Some bug reports sent to the security team sometimes lack any explanation,
> are only AI-generated without verification, or sometimes it can simply be
> difficult to have a conversation with an invisible reporter belonging to
> an opaque team. This fortunately remains rare but the trend has been
> steadily increasing over the last years and it seems important to clarify
> what developers expect from reporters to avoid frustration on any side and
> keep the process efficient.
> 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Both of these look good to me, thanks!  I'll queue them up after the
next -rc is out.

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux