From: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@xxxxxxxxx> The comment was correct, but `checkpatch` script flagged it with a warning as shown in the output section. The comment is slightly modified to improve readability, which also suppresses the warning. ``` [command] ./script/checkpatch.pl --strict -f tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c [output] WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'on' ``` Fixes: 98102a2cb7860 : kselftest/arm64: Hold fp-stress children until they're all spawned. Signed-off-by: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@xxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c index 74e23208b94c..3a0ae96cf909 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c @@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ static void child_start(struct child_data *child, const char *program) /* * Read from the startup pipe, there should be no data - * and we should block until it is closed. We just - * carry on on error since this isn't super critical. + * and we should block until it is closed. We just + * carry-on on error since this isn't super critical. */ ret = read(3, &i, sizeof(i)); if (ret < 0) -- 2.25.1
