Re: [PATCH net-next v01 01/12] hinic3: HW initialization

[ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> +static int db_area_idx_init(struct hinic3_hwif *hwif, u64 db_base_phy,
> +			    u8 __iomem *db_base, u64 db_dwqe_len)
> +{
> +	struct hinic3_db_area *db_area = &hwif->db_area;
> +	u32 db_max_areas;
> +
> +	hwif->db_base_phy = db_base_phy;
> +	hwif->db_base = db_base;
> +	hwif->db_dwqe_len = db_dwqe_len;
> +
> +	db_max_areas = db_dwqe_len > HINIC3_DB_DWQE_SIZE ?
> +		       HINIC3_DB_MAX_AREAS : db_dwqe_len / HINIC3_DB_PAGE_SIZE;
> +	db_area->db_bitmap_array = bitmap_zalloc(db_max_areas, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!db_area->db_bitmap_array)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	db_area->db_max_areas = db_max_areas;
> +	spin_lock_init(&db_area->idx_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void db_area_idx_free(struct hinic3_db_area *db_area)
> +{
> +	kfree(db_area->db_bitmap_array);

db_bitmap_array allocation was done via bitmap_zalloc().
is it ok to use kfree? or bitmap_free

> +}
> +
>   static int get_db_idx(struct hinic3_hwif *hwif, u32 *idx)
>   {
>   	struct hinic3_db_area *db_area = &hwif->db_area;
> @@ -125,6 +273,15 @@ void hinic3_set_msix_state(struct hinic3_hwdev *hwdev, u16 msix_idx,
>   	hinic3_hwif_write_reg(hwif, addr, mask_bits);
>   }
>   
[clip]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_pci_id_tbl.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_pci_id_tbl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7d60bd45ad1b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_pci_id_tbl.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright (c) Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 2025. All rights reserved. */
> +
> +#ifndef _HINIC3_PCI_ID_TBL_H_
> +#define _HINIC3_PCI_ID_TBL_H_
> +
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI    0x19e5

kernel already has PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI in <linux/pci_ids.h>

> +#define PCI_DEV_ID_HINIC3_VF    0x375F
> +
> +#endif
Thanks,
Alok