On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:39:46AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Are you (implicitly?) saying that all previous attempts at transitional > kconfig symbols have failed? If so, I just wasn't aware of that. I haven't found any way to do a "proper" CONFIG transition. I looked through past transitions and they all left stuff visible. Is there a way to actually do this with existing kconfig? -- Kees Cook
