Re: [TECH TOPIC] Kernel documentation - update and future directions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:05:19PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> Does the kernel docs have any concept of incremental builds? Adding
> one patch and rebuilding the kernel is generally fast, unless it
> changes an important header. So the cost is reasonably small for two
> builds. But if building the kernel documentation twice is going to
> cost 6 minutes, this does not scale.

FWIW I do the same and would face similar issues, though for docs I
could probably cope with selectively building only tips of branches
given how infrequently they're touched.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux