On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:05:19PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Does the kernel docs have any concept of incremental builds? Adding > one patch and rebuilding the kernel is generally fast, unless it > changes an important header. So the cost is reasonably small for two > builds. But if building the kernel documentation twice is going to > cost 6 minutes, this does not scale. FWIW I do the same and would face similar issues, though for docs I could probably cope with selectively building only tips of branches given how infrequently they're touched.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature