Em Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:59:38 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Em Tue, 2 Sep 2025 12:15:51 +0100 > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 12:56:57AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > > If you run: > > > > > kernel-doc . --none -Wall > > > > > You won't have troubles with Sphinx slowness. It would be worth timing > > > it on you machine and see how much time it takes to run. Probably > > > the run time depends a little bit on the Python version. Not sure how > > > much optimization it got(*). > > > > That takes about 90s for me. > > > I wander why here is 3 times faster... disk cache? python version? > faster ssd? > > What python version are you using? Heh, after running twice or three times to avoid cache issues, I tested running it on my machine with two different python versions: $ time python3.13 scripts/kernel-doc.py . --none real 0m31,660s user 0m30,911s sys 0m0,588s $ time python3.9 scripts/kernel-doc.py . --none real 0m59,004s user 0m58,014s sys 0m0,730s $ time python3.6 scripts/kernel-doc.py . --none real 1m16,494s user 1m15,400s sys 0m0,765s (after a fix I'm about to send to prevent lots of output about python version) So, yeah, Python version seems to be one of the reasons why it is taking so long on your machine. Thanks, Mauro
