On 9/3/25 2:45 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 1:38 PM Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+
+ spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
+
+ if (atomic_read(&task->seccomp.filter_count) == 0) {
+ spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
did you copy this pattern from somewhere ?
It's obviously buggy.
I tried to mimic the logic in copy_seccomp() in kernel/fork.c,
but as you point out, I probably messed it up :).
Do you have recommendations for a better design pattern?
Thanks!
Tom