On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 09:37:14AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 09:04:10AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 08:46:39PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > Kees Cook (9): > > > compiler_types.h: Move __nocfi out of compiler-specific header > > > x86/traps: Clarify KCFI instruction layout > > > x86/cfi: Document the "cfi=" bootparam options > > > x86/cfi: Standardize on common "CFI:" prefix for CFI reports > > > x86/cfi: Add "debug" option to "cfi=" bootparam > > > x86/cfi: Remove __noinitretpoline and __noretpoline > > > > So I can take these first 6 patches (and edit that debug patch to > > un-annoy myself ;-), but I'm thinking this Kconfig stuff: > > Sure, yeah. Do you want a v3 for the debug stuff that uses your proposed > helper? Nah, already done :-) I just pushed out these 6 and my UDB hackery to queue.git/x86/core. If the robots don't complain, I'll stuff it into tip in a few days. > > > kconfig: Add transitional symbol attribute for migration support > > > kcfi: Rename CONFIG_CFI_CLANG to CONFIG_CFI > > > > Should perhaps go through the kbuild tree? A > > I had chatted offline with Nathan about this series, and he'd suggested > the kconfig change could go with it's first user (the rename). So if you > don't want to put it in -tip, I can take it in the hardening tree. > (There's no dependencies between these 2 and the first 6.) So I suppose I can carry them, just to keep the lot together, but then I need an ack from someone that actually knows this Kconfig language stuff :-) You taking them through the hardening tree also works for em.
