On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 06:56:35AM +0800, Asuna wrote: > > One thing - please don't send new versions > > of patchsets in response to earlier versions or other threads. It > > doesn't do you any favours with mailbox visibility. > > I apologize for this, I'm pretty much new to mailing lists, so I had > followed the step "Explicit In-Reply-To headers" [1] in doc. For future > patches I'll send them alone instead of replying to existing threads. > > [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.9/process/submitting-patches.html#explicit-in-reply-to-headers Ye I think this is mostly just misleading. You're better off providing a lore link in the body of the mail than replying to some old thread. I find that explicit in-reply-to stuff only really helpful to send a single patch as part of a conversation where it's effectively an RFC.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
