Re: [PATCH net-next v11 4/5] net: rnpgbe: Add basic mbx_fw support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:21:58AM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Yibo Dong schrieb am Mi 10. Sep, 14:08 (+0800):
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 01:58:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 19:59:11 +0530 Anwar, Md Danish wrote:
> > > > > +int mucse_mbx_sync_fw(struct mucse_hw *hw)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	int try_cnt = 3;
> > > > > +	int err;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	do {
> > > > > +		err = mucse_mbx_get_info(hw);
> > > > > +		if (err == -ETIMEDOUT)
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +		break;
> > > > > +	} while (try_cnt--);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return err;
> > > > > +}  
> > > > 
> > > > There's a logical issue in the code. The loop structure attempts to
> > > > retry on ETIMEDOUT errors, but the unconditional break statement after
> > > > the if-check will always exit the loop after the first attempt,
> > > > regardless of the error. The do-while loop will never actually retry
> > > > because the break statement is placed outside of the if condition that
> > > > checks for timeout errors.
> > > 
> > 
> > What is expected is 'retry on ETIMEDOUT' and 'no retry others'. 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/a066746c-2f12-4e70-b63a-7996392a9132@xxxxxxx/
> > 
> > > The other way around. continue; in a do {} while () look does *not*
> > > evaluate the condition. So this can loop forever.
> > > 
> > 
> > Maybe I can update like this ?
> > 
> > int mucse_mbx_sync_fw(struct mucse_hw *hw)
> > {
> > 	int try_cnt = 3;
> > 	int err;
> > 
> > 	do {
> > 		err = mucse_mbx_get_info(hw);
> > 		if (err != -ETIMEDOUT)
> > 			break;
> > 		/* only retry with ETIMEDOUT, others just return */
> > 	} while (try_cnt--);
> > 
> > 	return err;
> > }  
> 
> How about something like this?
> 
> int mucse_mbx_sync_fw(struct mucse_hw *hw)
> {
> 	for (int try = 3; try; --try) {
> 		int err = mucse_mbx_get_info(hw);
> 		if (err != -ETIMEDOUT)
> 			return err;
> 	}
> 
> 	return ETIMEDOUT;
> }
> 

I think Jakub Kicinski's suggestion is clearer, right?
	do {
		err = mucse_mbx_get_info(hw);
	} while (err == -ETIMEDOUT && try_cnt--);

> 
> My 2cent.
> 
> Regards Jörg
> 
> -- 
> „Es wurden und werden zu viele sprachlose Bücher gedruckt, nach deren
> schon flüchtiger Lektüre man all die Bäume um Vergebung bitten möchte,
> die für den Schund ihr Leben lassen mussten.“ (Michael Jürgs,
>                       Seichtgebiete – Warum wir hemmungslos verblöden)

Thanks for your feedback.






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux