Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: re-enable gcc + rust builds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/10/25 10:27 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
FWIW, this --- breaks git, and anything after this line (including your
signoff) is lost when the patch is applied.

I used b4 command to prepare and send the cover letter and patch for v2, not sure what happened.

I see that other people's patches have a [PATCH 0/n] email as a start that describes their patch series, this is called a cover-letter in b4 and git-send-email right?

The riscv patchwork CI stuff is really unhappy with this change:
init/Kconfig:87: syntax error
init/Kconfig:87: invalid statement
init/Kconfig:88: invalid statement
init/Kconfig:89:warning: ignoring unsupported character '`'
init/Kconfig:89:warning: ignoring unsupported character '`'
init/Kconfig:89:warning: ignoring unsupported character '.'
init/Kconfig:89: unknown statement "This"

Is this bogus, or can rustc-bindgen-libclang-version return nothing
under some conditions where rust is not available?
Should this have 2 default lines like some other options in the file?

This is because rustc-bindgen-libclang-version can't find the bindgen and returns nothing. Sorry I forgot to mention this, it's another reason why I wanted to separate the script, in a separate script we can easily fallback to return 0 when an error is encountered.

Adding a second line `default 0` doesn't work, I'll try to fix it. BTW, when I fix it, if the diff isn't too large, do I need to open a v3 patch, or simply replying to the thread just fine?




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux