On 9/9/25 4:09 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:06:43 -0700 > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > >> On 9/9/25 12:58 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>> Em Tue, 9 Sep 2025 00:27:20 -0700 >>> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > >>>> +.. kernel-doc:: init/kdoc-globals-test.c >>>> + :identifiers: >>>> >>>> The html output says >>>> "Kernel Globals" >>>> but nothing else. >>> >>> I usually don't add :identifiers: on kernel-doc entries. If you use >>> identifiers, you need to explicitly tell what symbols you want. >> >> Well, it worked/works without using having any identifiers listed, and >> the docs in Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst says that they are >> optional: >> >> identifiers: *[ function/type ...]* >> Include documentation for each *function* and *type* in *source*. >> If no *function* is specified, the documentation for all functions >> and types in the *source* will be included. >> *type* can be a struct, union, enum, or typedef identifier. > > Hmm.. looking the entire logic: > > elif 'identifiers' in self.options: > identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split() > if identifiers: > for i in identifiers: > i = i.rstrip("\\").strip() > if not i: > continue > > cmd += ['-function', i] > self.msg_args["symbol"].append(i) > else: > cmd += ['-no-doc-sections'] > self.msg_args["no_doc_sections"] = True > > I suspect that an empty identifier could be raising an exception. > > The right logic should be, instead: > > - elif 'identifiers' in self.options: > - identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split() > - if identifiers: > - for i in identifiers: > + elif 'identifiers' in self.options: > + identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers') > + if identifiers: > + for i in identifiers.split(): > > (tests needed) Sheesh, I can't find that code so that I can patch it. (in today's linux-next 20250909) Anyway, does this take away something that currently works? thanks. -- ~Randy