Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: add support for handling global variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/9/25 4:09 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:06:43 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> 
>> On 9/9/25 12:58 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em Tue, 9 Sep 2025 00:27:20 -0700
>>> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> 
>>>> +.. kernel-doc:: init/kdoc-globals-test.c
>>>> +   :identifiers:
>>>>
>>>> The html output says
>>>> "Kernel Globals"
>>>> but nothing else.  
>>>
>>> I usually don't add :identifiers: on kernel-doc entries. If you use
>>> identifiers, you need to explicitly tell what symbols you want.  
>>
>> Well, it worked/works without using having any identifiers listed, and
>> the docs in Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst says that they are
>> optional:
>>
>> identifiers: *[ function/type ...]*
>>   Include documentation for each *function* and *type* in *source*.
>>   If no *function* is specified, the documentation for all functions
>>   and types in the *source* will be included.
>>   *type* can be a struct, union, enum, or typedef identifier.
> 
> Hmm.. looking the entire logic:
> 
>         elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>             identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>             if identifiers:
>                 for i in identifiers:
>                     i = i.rstrip("\\").strip()
>                     if not i:
>                         continue
> 
>                     cmd += ['-function', i]
>                     self.msg_args["symbol"].append(i)
>             else:
>                 cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>                 self.msg_args["no_doc_sections"] = True
> 
> I suspect that an empty identifier could be raising an exception.
> 
> The right logic should be, instead:
> 
> -        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> -            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
> -            if identifiers:
> -                for i in identifiers:
> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers')
> +            if identifiers:
> +                for i in identifiers.split():
> 
> (tests needed)

Sheesh, I can't find that code so that I can patch it.
(in today's linux-next 20250909)

Anyway, does this take away something that currently works?

thanks.
-- 
~Randy





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux