On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:04:20 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:15:44 +0900 > Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > >> [-CC: rust people and list] >> >> OK, Looks like I have to bite. >> >> On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:33:34 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> [...] >> >>> The current approach of using LaTeX for PDF is dirty: >>> >>> - Sphinx can't produce a LaTeX file from the Kernel trees without >>> hundreds of warnings; >>> - latexmk hides some of them, but even it just one warning is reported, >>> the return status is not zero. >> >> This sounds interesting to me. >> As far I remember, I have never seen such strange results of latexmk >> under build envs where all the necessary packages are properly installed. > > I saw it here on multiple distros including Fedora (which is the one > I use on my desktop). Media jenkins CI running on Debian always suffered > from such issues, up to the point I started ignoring pdf build results. > So please provide exact steps for me to see such errors. I don't have any issues after strictly following the suggestions from sphinx-pre-install under Fedora. I even invoked [...]/output/latex/Makefile manually after running "make latexdocs" by: - cd [...]/output/latex/ - make PDFLATEX="latexmk -xelatex" LATEXOPTS="-interaction=batchmode -no-shell-escape" -j6 -O all , and all the PDFs were built without any issues. Quite puzzling ... Or does your Fedora have some Noto CJK variable fonts installed? Hmm ... Thanks, Akira
